So, it's OK to recognize states' sovereignty when it represents a cause you approve of (Gay Marriage) - but when it's something you disagree with (Obamacare health mandates) - then, well states can't supersede the Fed!
Now, please folks, don't misinterpret me. I couldn't give two shits about whether or not gays marry - I'm a live and let live kinda guy. In fact, I'm a bit torn when I see states passing anti-gay legislation. On the one hand, I see Federalism at work and the majority's opinion being codified in state law. On the other, I see a group of people (gays) being told by a government that basically they don't enjoy the same rights as another group. As a Libertarian, it's hard to stomach that type of discrimination.
Point here, is that the Times gets all rah-rah when the court sets aside state laws it doesn't like (Gay marriage restrictions, AZ Immigration), and cries foul when the court might set aside laws it approves of (like gun control). You can't really have it both ways.
Saturday, July 10, 2010
States rights - or wrongs?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment